Chess Openings for White: 1. e4 or 1. d4?

Choosing chess openings for white is really one decision, made on move one, and everything after it is detail. Play 1. e4 and you owe yourself three separate answers to three unrelated defenses. Play 1. d4 and you can get away with one setup for years. Here is that choice settled with real numbers from 1.83 billion club games, and then the exact lines for whichever side you land on.

1. e4 or 1. d4: one question picks your whole repertoire

The scores are almost identical. In the 1000 to 1600 band, 1. d4 scores 52.7% for White and 1. e4 scores 51.9%, across 1.83 billion games between them. Anyone who tells you one first move is objectively better for a club player is arguing about 0.8 of a percentage point. One note on reading every "vs baseline" number below: each line is measured at the position its moves reach, and compared against White's unconditional score after that first move. So it answers "when I get this position, how does it go?", not "is this objectively best", and part of any gap is which opponents choose to enter the line at all.

The difference that actually matters is how much you have to learn, and that is enormous. After 1. e4, Black splits your games six ways, and the three that cost White the most ground are the three that need the most preparation:

Read that table again, because it is the whole article. White does fine against 1... e5 at 53.0%, and fine against the Scandinavian and the Pirc. Against the Sicilian and the Caro-Kann, White scores 2.7 points below the 1. e4 average, and those two are roughly one in six of all your 1. e4 games (237 million of 1.36 billion). The French costs another 1.8. The 1. e4 player who only studies 1... e5 lines has prepared for the games they were already winning.

What White is actually trying to do out of the opening

White's advantage is one move of time. Every opening below is a different way of spending it, and every bad opening is a way of wasting it. The four things you are buying:

Notice what is not on that list: memorising fifteen moves of theory. Nothing below asks you to.

The 1. e4 repertoire, ranked by what it actually scores

All of these are answers to 1... e5, the reply you meet most. Compare each against White's 51.9% baseline after 1. e4, not against 50%, or you will rate every one of them as good.

The Scotch Game is the pick, at 55.5%. 3. d4 hits the e5 pawn a second time, Black cannot hold it, and the centre opens on move three. That is 2.6 points better than the Italian Game, and it keeps the game open instead of letting it drift into the slow manoeuvring where club players run out of ideas. The one line to know: after 3... exd4 4. Nxd4 Bc5, the natural 5. Nxc6 runs into 5... Qf6, hitting the knight and looking down the f-file. It is fine for White, you just need the reply ready: 6. Qd2 or 6. Qf3. If you would rather skip it, 5. Be3 holds everything together.

The Italian Game is the most played opening in the world and it scores +1.0. That is not a reason to avoid it. It is a reason to know that its popularity, not its results, is why every beginner list puts it first. It earns its place if you like the Fried Liver and the Greek Gift patterns that come out of it, and it is the safest introduction to open positions there is.

The Vienna Game at +0.5 is the trap specialist, and the number understates it. 2. Nc3 followed by Bc4 sets up the Qg4 lunge against the copycat 3... Bc5, which is exactly what an unprepared club opponent plays and exactly where the Chessigma course starts. Take it if you enjoy winning games in fifteen moves. Do not take it if you want a system you never have to think about.

Two more worth naming. The Ruy Lopez scores 53.5% and is the most respected opening on the list, at the cost of real theory. The King's Gambit scores 55.6%, the highest of any of them, and it is a genuine gambit: that edge comes from opponents who do not know the refutation, so it shrinks as you climb. If you came here looking for the most aggressive chess openings for White, it is that one and the Smith-Morra in the anti-Sicilian table below. Play either knowing what you bought.

The 1. d4 repertoire: the London System, and one setup for everything

The London System scores 54.4%, which is 1.7 points above the 1. d4 baseline, over 53.3 million games, measured at the accelerated 2. Bf4 move order against 1... d5. The Queen's Gambit scores higher, at 55.3%, and it is the honest recommendation for anyone willing to learn a real body of theory: after 2. c4 you have to answer the Slav, the Queen's Gambit Declined, the Accepted and half a dozen Indian defenses. The London is the one that costs almost nothing.

Beyond 1. e4 and 1. d4: the English Opening

The English Opening, 1. c4, scores 52.9% over 47.9 million games, 0.9 points above White's overall average. It claims the centre from the side instead of occupying it, which takes your opponent out of their preparation on move one, and it transposes into a lot of the same structures as 1. d4 if you want it to.

What to play against the Sicilian, the Caro-Kann and the French

This is the section the 1. e4 player actually needs, and the one every beginner guide skips. Three defenses, ranked by what White really scores against each way of meeting them. Two warnings before the tables. The most popular choice is the worst against the French and the second worst against the Caro-Kann, so popularity is not your guide. And the top scorer against both the Caro-Kann and the French has a much smaller sample than the rest of its column, so treat those two as promising rather than proven.

Against the Sicilian, 1... c5

Nothing beats the Sicilian. Averaged across everything White tries it scores 49.2% against 1... c5, 2.7 points below its own baseline, and the spread below separates a bad answer from a passable one rather than from a winning one. The goal is damage control plus a position you understand. The Alapin, 2. c3, is the sane club answer: 51.7%, seven million games, and one idea: build the big centre with d4, and when Black hits it with 2... d5 take with exd5 and gain time on the queen. The Smith-Morra scores highest at 52.6% and it is a gambit, so the same caveat as the King's Gambit applies. Avoid the Closed Sicilian: 48.7%, the worst number in this article, 3.2 points below baseline over twelve million games. It looks safe and it concedes ground move by move. Note that the Grand Prix row above sits inside this one: 2. Nc3 is where both begin, and adding f4 is worth two and a half points.

Against the Caro-Kann, 1... c6

Here the data disagrees with the crowd, and we will say so about our own course. The Advance, 3. e5, is by far the most played choice at 14.3 million games, and it scores 50.3%, worse than the quiet 3. Nc3 at 52.5%. If you want the best club-level result from a line with a real sample, play 3. Nc3. If you want the sharp version with a concrete attacking plan, Chessigma's Advance Variation course teaches the 4. h4 Bayonet, the bishop trap and the king hunt, which is where the Advance's wins come from when they come. The Panov's 54.0% is the best number in the column on a much smaller sample.

Against the French, 1... e6

The same shape again: the Advance, 3. e5, is the popular one at 18.5 million games and the worst one at 48.9%, three points below baseline. The Tarrasch, 3. Nd2, tops the column at 54.6% on half a million games. The reliable middle is 3. Nc3 at 51.6%, essentially baseline, and it is the move that keeps the most options open, at the price of letting Black choose between the Winawer, the Classical and the Rubinstein. If you want to know what you are up against from the other side, Chessigma teaches the French from Black's point of view.

How to tell whether your repertoire survives contact

Every number on this page is an average over millions of players. Yours is the only one that decides your rating, and you already have the data: import ten of your own games and look at the point where the game stops being theory. That is where your repertoire actually ends, whatever you think you know.

The review counts your theory moves, grades every move from Sigma down to Clown, and reports accuracy and centipawn loss for both sides. It is free and unlimited, and the engine runs in your browser rather than on a queue. If the theory count stops on move four in most of your games, the fix is not a new opening. It is drilling the one you already picked.

Frequently asked questions